15 Comments

What an Opus Magnus.

I'm not confident about sharing it with the people whom I know.

Those few with whom I have discussed the topic see depopulation as a good thing. Probing shows that they don't think that they will be getting depopped, just the other people.

Expand full comment

like the greenie I ran into a few years ago, desperate whining about too many people on the planet. When I suggested he do the right thing and kill himself. He got angry. I guess he didn't mean himself.

Expand full comment

Funny how when you point out the obvious ways they can act on their belief...they don't seem to take kindly to the suggestion!

Expand full comment

On a lighter note, I see where the pet rock idea came from.

That business about the rock as a living being was new to me.

As was the Codex Alimentarius!!

Thank you for all your work.

Expand full comment

Thank you for your comments and kind words! And the pet rock notion - made me laugh : )

Expand full comment

Same here. People I know are firm believers..just not for themselves.

Expand full comment

Haven’t read it all yet, but some quick thoughts. The hubris is astonishing, they believe they have the right to act like gods. And what is so elite about them? How many of them would have been fit for us to hire as cyclotron operators? I doubt they could hold down such a job, or even work in your local auto repair shop. It doesn’t seem to occur to them that they are attempting a monstrous evil, and certainly not that they might face metaphysical consequences.

Expand full comment

Absolutely spot on. They are sick, perverted, sociopaths. Evil narcissists. They have no concern whatsoever about their fellow human beings. (Actually, that statement gives them too much credit...for being human!).

Expand full comment

What makes them so sure that we are above the sustainability limits? When the Club of Rome computer simulations showing collapse were done I was working in a group at an auto company doing mathematical computer simulations. We were not impressed.

When a country reaches a certain level of technological sophistication the population explosion ends, possibly because the need for children as farm hands diminishes, no longer do half of the children die, etc. It is true of the first world countries. Probably, if they just left well enough alone the world population would reach a peak and diminish on it's own.

The very rich often lack a purpose in life since food and shelter are not an issue. Things like this give them purpose.

Again, who do they think they are? What makes them think they are high minded?

Expand full comment

They spend too much time drinking and egging each other on.

Expand full comment

Wonder how they would like the depopulation agenda knocking on their door and affected their children , grandchildren , loved ones ….. OR themselves.

Expand full comment

If only they had the capacity to care...

Expand full comment

I see "It" as Good vs evil The existential fight for our planet Earth in our time.

I see Good = "New Era Home Building" for building "New Era Community" demonstrated at scale, opening the door leading to the sustainable, abundant life for 9 billion on planet earth. This Plan was preempted and not yet widely known. Which has cleared the way for

I see evil = depopulation via total control and genetic engineering takeover of our earth. "their" plans now in full view.

Expand full comment

I see those things too...

Expand full comment

I have figured out that we cannot tell people anything because nobody really listens. They don’t listen because they don’t understand - even though we are speaking out to help with their understanding…they think they can’t grasp the small-ness of the nano world. They also think they cannot grasp the infinite expanse of spacer - or how to measure a light-year. These concepts are the type that tend to shut people down; these concepts allow people to build their own walls around those things they don’t understand - blocking them out of their conscious endeavors.

Nobody likes to feel like a dumbass.

Since we can’t use words to assimilate such concepts into common knowledge and common brains - we have to SHOW people things that they can see with their own eyes. While we still can.

A person does not have to understand the duality of a Janus particle to see it in play. You don’t have to understand WHY a Janus particle has two faces, or how it is made, or what it does, etc to understand the simple and specific notions of their use when we can show concepts rather than spouting a bunch of bullshit that nobody understands.

My approach with my substack is simply to show the people who don’t care to take the time to learn about these “impossibly small” bits THAT THEY actually EXIST.

One by one I have singled out each tiny structure, found it in the literature and then showed an appropriate image in simple side-by-side comparison. I simply show that it is real, that it can be assembled or computationally instructed to build itself and that it, as a single structure is not out of the scope of comprehension and not all that hard to grasp in its singular capacity. Then I pick a different example and I do it again, and again and again until people understand that microtechnology is ubiquitous and actually pretty easily understood despite the fact that we can’t see it without a simple tool.

As for the nanotechnology and people’s argument that we can’t even see nanotech with regular microscopes - they’re right…but if stuff suddenly appears on a slide where there had been nothing…can’t we assume that something was actually there before whatever structure magically appeared. It’s not magic - it is nano. Put enough nano dimensions (3 planes of formation) together and suddenly it’s considered Microtech because we can see it now. Something was there to begin with -we have to know that something was there because nothing is produced from nothingness… something was there.

Expand full comment