All Roads Lead to Depopulation - Part 1

Mention the word “depopulation” in conversation today with anyone who has not yet awoken to the truth and you will likely be met with derision, scorn, and disbelief. You may be relegated to the class of misfits labeled conspiracy theorists. You may even be shunned or silenced. Let’s face it, the word is an ugly word – a word that denotes widescale evil and contemptible hubris on the part of those who seek to depopulate. So, how can we discuss this ancient to modern-day practice of exterminating entire populations of human beings, without being tuned-out by those who simply cannot fathom that we are encountering it today? I am unsure of the answer to that question, though it is not rhetorical. It’s a question we need to press to seek answers to, so we can share what we know with those being shielded from truth by powerful forces.

What I do know is that this single issue ties all of the catastrophic events of the last several years together. It is the ultimate goal behind the global-communist-totalitarian power grab, encroaching wildly, worldwide at present. While several reasons are mentioned by those who secretly advocate for depopulation, some ostensibly bearing an altruistic guise, those purported reasons are merely doublespeak rationalizations to hide the actual reason, which is to gain and maintain complete control of humanity by a small group of elites, so they can preserve their power and exterminate all sources of threats to and exposure of their generational crimes against humanity.

Depopulation has existed in one form or another for centuries. For our purposes of examining its import in context of the present, I will concentrate this discussion more fully on this past 100 years.

From Jacqueline R. Kasun’s 2001 work, Population Control Today - and Tomorrow?, you can read about the roots of the depopulation movement:

The quest of those in power to control population is at least as old as the Exodus story of Pharaoh killing Hebrew baby boys. In our time, the movement has received stimuli from both eugenics and environmental worries.

Kasun’s work elaborates on the utilization of “dire situations” to gain support for policies supporting the depopulation agenda. Sound familiar? Same ploy, different “dire situation.”

Another paper, “Eugenics, Racism, and Population Control,” by Lien of Oz, states:

For over 200 years, an elite core of powerful global leaders and grossly affluent individuals and foundations, have promulgated the fear of over-population. They have persisted with devious schemes to control the earth’s population. Historically this onslaught finds its starting pointing in the essay, "Principle of Population," written in 1798 by Thomas Malthus. His thesis was that human population growth would outpace the earth’s capacity to feed the growing mass of humanity. Malthus’ ideas captured the attention of Charles Darwin and coloured his evolutionary theory of natural selection. This is reflected in the extended title of Darwin’s document, "Origin of the Species, by Means of Natural Selection and the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life." Darwin’s cousin Francis Galton however, went further. He introduced the idea of good and bad genes - respectively eugenic vs. digenic; the idea of good births or, eugenics, had arrived.

The above-linked paper names many important individuals and organizations over the last century instrumental to the development of “population control” strategies. It gives a historical outline to the depopulation movement by elites. This depopulation movement, rooted in Eugenics hundreds of years ago, has morphed over generations into today’s democide, a genocide of citizens by their own government, on an unprecedented global scale.

WORTH NOTING: “Population Control: An Unnecessary Evil,” by Brian Douglass, elegantly refutes the idea of our planet’s overpopulation causing unsustainability. While my focus in this essay is on establishing the existence of the depopulation movement, including in today’s day and age, I recommend reading this paper to review those arguments that negate the suppositions that higher populations equal less resources or sustainability.

Following are video clips of some of the proponents for population control, also referred to as population stabilization and population reduction:

David Rockefeller:

Margaret Sanger:

Jane Goodall:

Dennis Meadows, a Club of Rome member, wishing that the needed depopulation would be accomplished in a civil manner, not through violence:

Ted Turner:

The following is a highly relevant and informative article from Substack’s “The Forgotten side of Medicine”:

Vaccines Have Been Repeatedly Developed for Forced Sterilization Campaigns.

Another article, referenced in the above article, is an excellent primer on “population control”:

The History of Population Control is Important for Understanding COVID-19

Still another article I recommend, including the many links it contains for further resources, is by one of my favorite writers on Substack, Margaret Anna Alice:

A Mostly Peaceful Depopulation

This next video of Dr. Len Horowitz, from 2009, also linked in the above article, is a comprehensive indictment of the ruling class who seek population reduction:

The following is an article, Message about Depopulation to Americans, penned by Stephanie R. Pasco, of Infowars, on August 27, 2009, in its entirety, with her permission granted for complete sharing:

MESSAGE ABOUT DEPOPULATION TO AMERICANS:

by Stephanie R. Pasco, Infowars – August 27, 2009

A mass vaccination campaign aimed at reducing the world population. How can this be true? All values we are taught are about preserving life, cure the sick and help everyone live a longer life. Could an opposite agenda exist behind the scenes without anyone knowing about it? The truth is that the depopulation theme for a long time has been the highest priority among the rulers of the world. They seem convinced that the right thing to do is to reduce the population on planet earth, drastically. They look at themselves as heroes, saviors of the planet. With such a mindset they seem to be willing to do whatever their mad scientists tell them is necessary. What would you do if you were extremely rich, felt responsible and were told that to save the world we need to reduce its population?

But if that is true why we are not told? Why do we not hear about it in mainstream media? These are very good and interesting questions and maybe they should be posed to media and journalists. In an article by Stephanie R. Pasco, published today on infowars.com, she presents very clear evidence for the depopulation agenda as stated by the rulers and their advisors themselves. If you ever doubted depopulation or the so-called End Game, please read and learn.

The Move to Depopulate the Planet

It is my intention to give you clips from documents, many from the United Nations that prove there is a plan to depopulate this planet. I will also provide quotes from various people and organizations that further show this agenda is afoot. I pray the guidance of the Lord God Almighty will be with me in this pursuit to warn others of this dark plot against humanity. Everything written in this paper is easily verifiable. It may take some time and effort, but I took great pains to make this paper as accurate as I possibly could.

The depopulation agenda is based on nature worship, or Gaia worship. In Genesis, God clearly told Adam and Eve, and then Noah and his family to go forth and multiply to fill the earth. Nowhere in the Bible does God rescind that clearly spoken commandment. Therefore, man is attempting to supersede the command of the Lord God in heaven: The Creator! I ask you, who knows more about the state of the earth, the created, or the Creator?

The basis for the depopulation agenda is a standard all elitists hold dear. This standard is called: The Hegelian Dialectic: Problem-Reaction-Solution. Create the Problem, cause a Reaction, offer a Solution. You will see exactly how they have created the problem, caused a reaction so widespread it is really quite impressive how successful they have been, and offered a solution: a deadly solution.

I ask that you please make an attempt to distribute this paper everywhere you possibly can. The time grows short and so many are going to be caught unawares. By getting the word out, you may be able to prevent someone from needless pain and suffering.

William Benton, Assistant U.S. Secretary of State at UNESCO 1946: (UNESCO is the United Nations Education, Science and Cultural Organization):

As long as a child breathes the poisoned air of nationalism, education in world-mindedness can produce only precarious results. As we have pointed out, it is frequently the family that infects the child with extreme nationalism. The schools therefore use the means described earlier to combat family attitudes that favor jingoism [nationalism] we shall presently recognize in nationalism the major obstacle to development of world-mindedness. We are at the beginning of a long process of breaking down the walls of national sovereignty. UNESCO must be the pioneer.

Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution, 1991:

In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap of mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.

Mikhail Gorbachev:

We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage.

Aldous Huxley, Brave New World 1946:

There is, of course, no reason why the new totalitarians should resemble the old. Government by clubs and firing squads, by artificial famine, mass imprisonment and mass deportation, is not merely inhumane; it is demonstrably inefficient and in an age of advanced technology, inefficiency is the sin against the Holy Ghost.

Aldous Huxley, Lecture named Population Explosion 1959:

Let us ask ourselves what the practical alternatives are as we confront this problem of population growth. One alternative is to do nothing in particular about it and just let things go on as they are. The question is: are we going to restore the balance in the natural way, which is a brutal and entirely anti-human way, or are we going to restore it in some intelligent, rational, and humane way? Try to increase production as much as possible and at the same time try to re-establish the balance between the birth rate, by means less gruesome than those which are used by nature, by intelligent and human methods? There are colossal difficulties in the way of implementing any large-scale policy of limitation of population; whereas death control is extremely easy under modern circumstances, birth control is extremely difficult. The reason is very simple: death control - the control, for example, of infectious diseases can be accomplished by a handful of experts and quite a small labour force of unskilled persons and requires a very small capital expenditure.

Barry Commoner, Making Peace with the Planet:

There have been triage proposals that would condemn whole nations to death through some species of global benign neglect. There have been schemes for coercing people to curtail their fertility, by physical and legal means that are ominously left unspecified. Now we are told that we must curtail rather than extend our efforts to feed the hungry peoples of the world. Where will it end?

Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, April 28, 1997, Testimony before Congressional Committee:

There are some reports, for example, that some countries have been trying to construct something like an Ebola Virus, and that would be a very dangerous phenomenon, to say the least. Alvin Toeffler has written about this in terms of some scientists in their laboratories trying to devise certain types of pathogens that would be ethnic specific so that they could just eliminate certain ethnic groups and races; and others are designing some sort of engineering, some sort of insects that can destroy specific crops. Others are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves. So, there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations. It’s real, and that’s the reason why we have to intensify our efforts, and that’s why this is so important.

Jacques Cousteau, UNESCO Courier 1991:

In order to save the planet, it would be necessary to kill 350,000 people per day. If we want our precarious endeavor to succeed, we must convince all human beings to participate in our adventure, and we must urgently find solutions to curb the population explosion that has a direct influence on the impoverishment of the less-favoured communities. Otherwise, generalized resentment will beget hatred, and the ugliest genocide imaginable, involving billions of people, will become unavoidable.

Uncontrolled population growth and poverty must not be fought from inside, from Europe, from North America, or any nation or group of nations; it must be attacked from the outside, by international agencies helped in the formidable job by competent and totally non-governmental organizations.

Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science on Society 1953:

I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing. War has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove more effective. If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation, survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full. The state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of that? Really high-minded people are indifferent to happiness, especially other people’s. There are three ways of securing a society that shall be stable as regards population. The first is that of birth control, the second that of infanticide or really destructive wars, and the third that of general misery except for a powerful minority.

Henry Kissinger, 1978:

U.S. policy toward the third world should be one of depopulation.

David Rockefeller, 2000:

We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.

David Rockefeller: Memoirs 2002, Founder of the Council on Foreign Relations:

We wield over American political and economical institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as internationalists and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political structure, one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.

David Rockefeller:

We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine & other great publications, whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promise of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plans for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government.

Thomas Ferguson, the Latin American Case Officer for the State Department s Office of Population Affairs (OPA) (now the US State Dept. Office of Population Affairs, est. by Henry Kissinger in 1975):

There is a single theme behind all our work - we must reduce population levels, said Thomas Ferguson, the Latin American case officer for the State Department s Office of Population Affairs (OPA). Either they [governments] do it our way, through nice clean methods or they will get the kind of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran, or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it. The professionals, said Ferguson, aren’t interested in lowering population for humanitarian reasons. That sounds nice. We look at resources and environmental constraints. We look at our strategic needs, and we say that this country must lower its population - or else we will have trouble. So, steps are taken. El Salvador is an example where our failure to lower population by simple means has created the basis for a national security crisis. The government of El Salvador failed to use our programs to lower their population. Now they get a civil war because of it. There will be dislocation and food shortages. They still have too many people there. (1981)

Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, April 28, 1997; Testimony before Congressional Committee:

And advanced forms of biological warfare that can target specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool.

Sir Julian Huxley, UNESCO: its Purpose and its Philosophy:

Political unification in some sort of world government will be required. Even though any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable. In the early 1950s, former Communist Joseph Z. Kornfeder expressed the opinion that UNESCO was comparable to a Communist Party agitation and propaganda department. He stated that such a party apparatus handles the strategy and method of getting at the public mind, young and old. Huxley would lard the agency with a motley collection of Communists and fellow travelers. President Richard Nixon believed abortion was necessary as a form of eugenics to prevent interracial breeding.

Theodore Roosevelt to Charles B. Davenport, January 3, 1913, Charles B. Davenport Papers, Department of Genetics, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.:

Society has no business to permit degenerates to reproduce their kind. Any group of farmers, who permitted their best stock not to breed, and let all the increase come from the worst stock, would be treated as fit inmates for an asylum. Some day we will realize that the prime duty, the inescapable duty of the good citizens of the right type is to leave his or her blood behind him in the world; and that we have no business to permit the perpetuation of citizens of the wrong type. The great problem of civilization is to secure a relative increase of the valuable as compared with the less valuable or noxious elements in the population. The problem cannot be met unless we give full consideration to the immense influence of heredity. I wish very much that the wrong people could be prevented entirely from breeding; and when the evil nature of these people is sufficiently flagrant, this should be done. Criminals should be sterilized and feebleminded persons forbidden to leave offspring behind them. The emphasis should be laid on getting desirable people to breed.

By Carl Teichrib:

The Georgia Guidestones, a massive granite edifice planted in the Georgia country side, contains a list of ten new commandments for Earth’s citizens. The first commandment, and the one which concerns this article, simply states: maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.

Robert Walker, former chair of PepsiCo and Proctor & Gamble on water:

Water is a gift of nature. Its delivery is not. It must be priced to insure it is used sustainably.

Ted Turner makes this radical statement:

A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.

Margaret Sanger (founder of Planned Parenthood, funded by the Rockefellers) said in her proposed “The American Baby Code”, which she intended to become law:

The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.

This is the woman to whom Hillary Clinton publicly declared she looked up to, during the 2008 presidential debates.

Here is a short list of more advocates of eugenics:

Alexander Graham Bell, George Bernard Shaw, H. G. Wells, Sidney Webb, William Beveridge, John Maynard Keynes, Margaret Sanger, Marie Stopes, Woodrow Wilson, Theodore Roosevelt, Emile Zola, John Harvey Kellogg, Winston Churchill, Linus Pauling, Sir Francis Galton, Charles B. Davenport

Futurist, Barbara Marx Hubbard:

Out of the full spectrum of human personality, one-fourth is electing to transcend. One-fourth is ready to so choose, given the example of one other. One-fourth is resistant to election. They are unattracted by life ever evolving. One-fourth is destructive. They are born angry with God. They are defective seeds. There have always been defective seeds. In the past they were permitted to die a natural death we, the elders, have been patiently waiting until the very last moment before the quantum transformation, to take action to cut out this corrupted and corrupting element in the body of humanity. It is like watching a cancer grow. Now, as we approach the quantum shift from creature-human to co-creative human, the human who is an inheritor of god-like powers, the destructive one-fourth must be eliminated from the social body. We have no choice, dearly beloveds. Fortunately, you, dearly beloveds, are not responsible for this act. We are. We are in charge of God’s selection process for planet Earth. He selects, we destroy. We are the riders of the pale horse, Death. We come to bring death to those who are unable to know God; the riders of the pale horse are about to pass among you. Grim reapers, they will separate the wheat from the chaff. This is the most painful period in the history of humanity.

Additionally, Alexander Haig is quoted referring to the US State Department Office of Population Affairs, which was established by Henry Kissinger in 1975. The title has since been changed to The Bureau of Oceans, International Environmental and Scientific Affairs. Accordingly, the Bureau of Oceans, International Environmental and Scientific Affairs has consistently blocked industrialization policies in the Third World, denying developing nation’s access to nuclear energy technology - the policies that would enable countries to sustain a growing population. According to State Department sources, and Ferguson himself, Alexander Haig is a firm believer in population control.

Although the above stated quotes should be sufficient to prove that the elitists in power have definite intent to depopulate this planet to what they deem to be a sustainable level, some will argue these are only opinions and are of no real consequence. I will now move on to providing bits of documentation showing this is a plan that has a worldwide scope of influence. Most of these documents are at least 10 years old, some older. That however, does not take away from the seriousness of the content. Do not think them invalid due to their age. It takes time to foment plans on such a grand scale. If you are honest with yourself, you can see glimpses of these things happening today.

I am going to cover some issues stemming from the UN Treaty on Biological Diversity (Agenda 21), which Bill Clinton signed into law in 1993 before it was sent to the U.S. Senate for ratification.

EPA Internal Working Document Ecosystem Management:

The executive branch should direct federal agencies to evaluate national policies, in light of international policies and obligations, and to amend national policies to achieve international objectives.

In other words, our federal bureaucrats are writing U.S. law, independent of Congress, who solely has Constitutional authority to do that. They are changing regulations and creating laws out of thin air. They are no longer working for the people of the United States. They are working for the international community. There are so many treaties written up that they have effectively bound the United States. Whereas, a few of the treaties were not a problem, the abundance – hundreds of them – have now taken control over all of our lives.  - Michael Coffman

UN Treaty on Biological Diversity Assessment on Desirable Culture:

Traditional societies have considered certain sites as sacred, where most human activities are prohibited. That is the heart of the Convention on Biodiversity. Locking up nearly 50% of the land area of the United States is their idea of protecting biological diversity. - Michael Coffman

UN Treaty on Biodiversity - Usage of Fertilizers, Not Sustainable:

That fertilizers have played an essential part in producing the world’s harvests is undisputed. It is estimated that if the use of fertilizers ceased, the world’s harvests would be cut almost in half. However, the negative side of the equation is that the nitrates from fertilizers seep into ground water aquifers and they are seriously implicated in the eutrophication of lakes, rivers and coastal ecosystems, causing often drastic changes in the fauna and flora. They are willing to take a course of action that will reduce the world’s food supply by half, or more, as they will likely reduce the use of pesticides, knowing full well how many people this will kill.  - Michael Coffman

UN Biodiversity Assessment on Sustainable Human Population; US Senate September 9, 1994:

A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the present North American material standard of living would be one billion people. This must be implemented within 30-50 years; 2/3 s of the population must be cut.

The UN says property rights:

Property rights are not absolute and unchanging, but are there for the convenience of whatever government wants to do. -  Michael Coffman

Nobody owns biodiversity, so everything we do impinges on biodiversity. Property rights become meaningless. At the Rio De Janeiro Summit it was decided that the Global Environmental Facility would be the depository of all property rights. - Michael Coffman

UN Biodiversity Assessment - The Worldview of Western Civilization, section 12.2.3, p. 835:

The western worldview is characteristic of large-scale societies, heavily dependent on resources brought from considerable distances. It is a worldview that is characterized by the denial of sacred attributes of nature, which became firmly established about 2000 years ago, with the Judeo-Christian-Islamic religious traditions.

This same treaty considers rocks to be living beings on an equal plane with human beings. Rocks, many believe, will reincarnate into lower life forms; and gradually into human beings.

Bureau of Land Management Internal Working Document:

Human Dimensions of Ecosystem Management Objective/Purpose:

All ecosystem management activities should consider human beings as biological resources.

This is reminiscent of Soylent Green. This document was brought before Congress and the statement created such an uproar that it was removed. Regardless of its removal, it still serves to prove the mindset of these people; just because this was removed from a document does not mean it was removed from the thoughts and the intended goals of those who penned it or who believe it. For the elite to be able to have management of the ecosystem, humans would have no more value than a rock. - Michael Coffman

UN Biodiversity Treaty UN Global Biological Assessment Sustainable Human Populations:

Population growth has exceeded the capacity of the biosphere (i.e. the earth). It is estimated that an agricultural world in which most human beings are peasants should be able to support 5 to 7 billion people.

Now I feel is an appropriate time to cover some other areas of government, as well as private organizations that would like to see the population of the world decrease at an astounding rate (up to 90%). This is a dark, bloody agenda that will cause terrible hardship and pain upon millions of people.

World Wildlife Fund, World Resources Institute International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN):

The IUCN involves the EPA, US Fish & Wildlife Service, the National Park Service, the United States Forest Service, Sierra Club, the Nature Conservancy, the National Wildlife Fund, the National Audubon Society, National Resources Defense Council, UNESCO, the Environmental Defense Fund, the U.N. Environmental Program, etc.

IUCN 1992 Covenant on the Environment and Development:

Eventually a wilderness network would dominate a region and thus would itself constitute the matrix, with human habitations being the islands. The remaining half of the US would be used as buffer zones.  The night before this treaty was ratified, Senator Mitchell withdrew it from the calendar and it was never voted on. It took four men, devoted to God in prayer to stop this treaty. The treaty still waits in the wings. Upon ratification, the US will have no ability to protect its own citizens. - Michael Coffman

Henry Kissinger had a similar plan to use food as a weapon in 1974, found in the National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests, which was adopted as official policy by then President Gerald Ford in November of 1975. This Memorandum outlined a covert plan to reduce population growth in lesser-developed countries by means of birth control, and implicitly, war and famine. Brent Scowcroft, who had by then replaced Kissinger as National Security Advisor, the same post Scowcroft held in the Bush Administration, was put in charge of implementing the plan. CIA Director George H.W. Bush was ordered to assist Scowcroft, as were the Secretaries of State, Treasury, Defense, and Agriculture. This document has never been renounced, only certain portions have been amended, leaving it as the foundational document on population control issued in the U.S. Government.

The major players in the founding of this document are as follows:

Henry Kissinger, Richard Nixon, Margaret Sanger, Paul Ehrlich, Werner Fornos, Timothy Wirth, The United Nations Population Fund, The United States Agency for International Development, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, International Planned Parenthood Federation, The Club of Rome, UNICEF, WHO, United Nations, World Bank

The document can be read here in its entirety, along with the other organizations and individuals complicit in this abomination: http://www.usmutes.com/NSSM200.htm

Adolph Hitler about using food as a weapon:

Let it be noted that Adolph Hitler also used food as weapon, stating that food is a beautiful instrument of maneuvering and disciplining the masses. Food has been used as a weapon of war for centuries. Why then would it be outrageous for the elite to use food as a weapon, both a physical and a psychological weapon, in a declared war on overpopulation? It would not be outrageous at all. As has been said time and time again, history repeats itself.

Now we will cover the Earth Charter.

The Earth Charter - A Radical Global Religion, created by Mikhail Gorbachev and Michael Strong:

The Earth Charter initiative reflects the conviction that a radical change in humanity’s attitudes and values is essential to achieve social, economic and ecological well-being in the 21st century. The commission plans to circulate a final version of the Charter as a People’s Treaty beginning in mid-1998. The Charter will be submitted to the U.N. General Assembly in the year 2000, where it will ensure a very strong document that reflects the emerging new global ethics. This is unprecedented; it is the first component of an authentic global governance. We are working for dialogue and peace. We are demonstrating our ability to assert control over our fate in a spirit of solidarity to organize our collective

sovereignty over this planet, our common heritage. The American people were not allowed to see this. Americans as a whole do not want the UN to be the head of a world government. The one thing the majority of this country values, above most everything else, is their freedom.

At the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, the Presidential Council on Sustainable Development in 1996 came to the conclusion that the world’s human population should not exceed 500 million people. That is a 93% reduction in population!

According to the UN video, Armed to the Teeth; also in the Freedom From War Policy, put into effect by JFK in 1961, general and complete disarmament and US military power was given over, in full, to the UN. This is a loss of the sovereignty of America. (Read this document at http://www.scribd.com/doc/5009662/Freedom-From-War ).

The Earth Charter (1992), A Spiritual Vision:

A consensus has developed that the Earth Charter should be the articulation of a spiritual vision that reflects universal spiritual values, including, but not limited to, ethical values a people’s charter that serves as a universal code of conduct for ordinary citizens, educators, business executives, scientists, religious leaders, nongovernmental organizers and national councils of sustainable development; and a declaration of principles that can serve as a soft tax document when endorsed by the UN General Assembly.

In its original form, The Earth Charter failed miserably due to its open, blatantly pantheistic approach. Gorbachev and Strong have worked diligently to change the language and make it appear less obvious. You may be wondering what the Earth Charter has to do with depopulation. It has everything to do with it. Here is a very brief synopsis of what the Charter holds for us.

According to The Earth Charter, we must:

Recognize that all beings are interdependent and every form of life has value (unborn children, of course, are not included in the UN s definition of every form of life. The Earth Summit II documents continue to support the UN s pro-abortion policies.)

Affirm faith in the inherent dignity of all human beings. (UN agencies, however, support policies of euthanasia for those determined not capable of living a quality life.)

Adopt at all levels sustainable development plans and regulations. (This is a prescription for global socialism in a super-regulated global state.)

Prevent pollution of any part of the environment (enforcing this dictum would mean stopping virtually all human activity.)

Internalize the full environmental and social costs of goods and services in the selling price. (This seemingly harmless sentence would empower the state to price, tax, and regulate all production and consumption.)

Ensure universal access to health care that fosters reproductive health and responsible reproduction. (This is a thinly disguised call for that includes abortion and population control.)

Eliminate discrimination in all its forms, such as that based on race [and] sexual orientation. (This provision is clearly aimed at criminalizing those who refuse to accept homosexuality as positive and good.)

Promote the equitable distribution of wealth within nations and among nations. (see: https://www.thefreelibrary.com/The+new+world+religion:+presented+to+the+world+as+a+mystical...-a091968392  for the full article)

The Earth Charter:

The Earth Charter has not been ratified. Do not make the mistake of assuming it has not been interwoven into our society, however! It is being taught in our schools and promoted shamelessly by Hollywood, the UN, NBC (owned by GE), ABC, CBS, CNN, HLN & all the Fox owned stations, with the exception of Fox News, in order to keep the supporters blinded to the machinations of Rupert Murdock. Do not be deceived!

The ability to freely procreate is soon to be removed from us, much as it has been in China for many years. Not only will we not be allowed to have children, anyone who is termed a useless eater (a term coined by Henry Kissinger) will be euthanized: mercilessly culled.

In Sweden, the Sterilization Act of 1934 provided for the voluntary sterilization of some mental patients. The law was passed while the Swedish Social Democratic Party was in power, though it was also supported by all other political parties in Parliament at the time, as well as the Lutheran Church and much of the medical profession. -Wikipedia

Canada has recently pushed similar legislation – assisted euthanasia for the sad, lonely, or depressed, etc.

Codex Alimentarius (CA):

America is scheduled to become compliant to Codex Alimentarius (CA) as of December 31, 2009.

Codex Alimentarius is going to regulate virtually anything that you put into your mouth that is not a pharmaceutical. The World Trade Organization (WTO) has accepted Codex Alimentarius and any nation that is a member of the WTO must become compliant with CA. In any dispute between 2 countries, the one that is Codex compliant automatically wins. This is quite an incentive for all nations to become compliant. – Dr. Rima Laibow

CA guidelines set for vitamins & minerals are said to be voluntary; however, they are scheduled to become mandatory on December 31, 2009. In 1994, Codex Alimentarius declared nutrients to be poisons: See the Dietary Supplement Health Education Act (DSHEA). Yet fluoride is acceptable! Why? It creates complacency. Proper nutrients will ensure a longer, healthier life. Not at all in keeping with a depopulation agenda.

From Esoteric Agenda, a documentary by Ben Stewart:

In 1962 it was decreed that there would be a move toward total global implementation of Codex Alimentarius. The date set for implementation is December 31, 2009. WHO and FAO are the commissions in charge of CA. They fund it and run it at the request of the U.N. According to WHO & FAO, epidemiological projections, it is estimated that according to the vitamin and mineral guideline alone; when CA goes into global implementation on December 31, 2009, it will result in a minimum of 3 billion deaths; 1 billion due through starvation. The next 2 billion will die from preventable diseases due to malnutrition.

The U.N. has put out dozens of reports calling for an 80% reduction in population (most put the number at 90%).

At the 1997 Women’s World Conference in Beijing, the head of the U.N. Food Program said, “We will use food as a weapon against the people.”

In conjunction with Codex Alimentarius, food will be limited and water consumption will be decreased to 10 gallons per day, per person. The average American uses 140 gallons of water every day. The food provided will be Genetically Modified and nutrient deficient.

As of the Codex Alimentarius (CA) implementation date of 12/31/09, if there were a famine anywhere in the world, it will be illegal to send any high nutrient density biscuits. Or to distribute them!

Once a country becomes CA compliant, CA can never be repealed. Membership with the WTO robs the member nations of any and all sovereignty. Germany is now CA compliant.

Codex Alimentarius goes hand in hand with Agenda 21 and the Kyoto Treaty. The deadline to implement both Agenda 21 and the Kyoto Treaty is 2012. – Dr. Rima Laibow

Agenda 21 was birthed out of the Rio Summit 1992.

Agenda 21 (A 21), a.k.a. Smart Growth, Regionalism, Visioning Processes, Action Plans, Shared Values; 20/20, Best Practices; Community Festivals & Public/Private Partnerships. These are the names you will hear A 21 called, the buzzwords.

Every county must set up a council to oversee the implementation of A 21. A 21 is Sustainable Development. Steven Rockefeller set up the Earth Charter, referenced above. The Earth Charter is the new One World Religion: Earth worship. The earth is considered to be sacred, and its protection is a sacred trust. Global responsibility will demand basic changes in values, behaviors and attitudes of government, the private sector, and civil society.

Under Sustainable Development, man is considered to be responsible for the pollution of the planet and is subordinate to all other living creatures. This is a direct contradiction to the Bible where God placed man in a position of dominion over the entire earth. The elite will worship and serve the creature, rather than the Creator.

The environmental agenda is a religion with earth worship at its root. As such, the following practices are all considered to be unsustainable: fossil fuels, artificial fertilizers, modern systems of agricultural production, irrigation water, herbicides, pesticides, farmland, pastures, grazing of livestock, consumerism, dietary habits, salt, sugar, private property, paved roads, dams, reservoirs, logging activities, fencing of pastures. - Joan Peros

Every environmental resource must be measured. What can be measured can be managed under the Millenium Ecosystem Assessment Project. - Joan Peros

Among the things considered to be unsustainable, as listed above, these are included: monotheism and the family unit. The health care plan of President Obama is under A 21. Under this health care plan, the family unit is very much being attacked. Anyone over age 65 must undergo end of life counseling by their doctor every 5 years. Abortion will be pushed that much harder, especially with the Science Czar wanting sterilants put into our water supply! One of the new appointees to the Obama Administration once said in a book he co-wrote that a child could be killed up to the age of 2 years old! What kind of a monster could think that is acceptable?

Nearly the exact language used to define Sustainable Development was taken from the 1977 Soviet Constitution!

The Family Dependency Ratio, under the United Nations, will look at every household. They will gauge what that household has produced in accordance with what it has used (i.e., resources) by the water bills, energy bills, etc. Are you using more than you are producing? Are you adding to the collective, or merely taking away? This is how the powers that be will determine whether you are a productive citizen, or, in the words of Henry Kissinger, a useless eater.

In 1990, Prince Charles formed The Prince of Wales Business Leaders Forum to bring together 50-60 of the world’s topmost multi-national/transnational corporations to start buying up governments around the world. This is Public/Private partnerships: This is the very definition of fascism.

I must stop here. At the rate things are now moving, I could add to this daily. December 31 is not so far away now, only 4 months. I must get this out now. Time is short. If you find this to be worthy, please, spread it everywhere you can. Email it, blog it, post it on forums; mail it. Do what you must. People are asleep. They must be woken up. Forced immunizations are right around the corner. These things will come to pass. It is our job to warn people. Please, I ask you, warn them.

Stephanie R. Pasco, Infowars - August 27, 2009

Please do share Stephanie Pasco’s work, noting it’s timing in 2009, during Obama’s first term, when the H1N1 was a failed “pandemic” attempt.

Finally, if you have not read my earlier article called, “Early Warnings,” you can find it here:

Please stay tuned, as I have much more information to share on this topic.

Thank you for reading and sharing -

Bianca