All Roads Lead to Depopulation – Part 9
Involuntary Mass Sterilization – Part 2
Since my last post, a multitude of historic occurrences have transpired. I arduously archive documentation and files as evidence of the Biblical-scale-events we are living through, hoping the files will survive for future historians to dissect long after I am gone. That said, in the last few months, the acceleration of world events, particularly in the US, has proliferated, so much so that my time is filled with trying to keep up with each day’s developments and which to archive, rather than writing. I hope to spend more time on writing soon, though, as there is a tremendous amount of information to share.
To add to my last post:
Having discussed forced and covert sterilization in specific populations in the last post of this series, I would like to add a newly discovered resource to the topic of forced sterilization in Canada, which was covered in that last post. The book, Hidden No Longer: Genocide in Canada, Past and Present by Kevin D. Annett, M.A., M.Div was published in 2010 and is shown below, along with its Table of Contents and, finally, a PDF of the book.
Within its pages, the author states the following:
There is no clearer indication of genocide than the existence of laws and practices,
which prevent births among targeted groups, either through sexual sterilizations
or abortions, killing pregnant mothers or their newborn babies, or disrupting
normal sexual and social relations between males and females of a group.
Below is a PDF of the complete book:
A few current items:
Before picking up where we left off with Part 8, I would like to share a few current resources with you.
In this brief, under-a-minute video, gifted Political Cartoonist, Bob Moran, accurately specifies what our biggest obstacle to defeating this globalist, medical totalitarian coup remains:
I wrote about the work of Mark Crispin Miller (MCM) in All Roads Lead to Depopulation - Part 6. Week in and week out, he aggregates lists of the countless victims of the COVID 19 “jab” democide, not just here, but around the world. It is a meticulous task that his inveterate team and he take on with consistency and with great pathos. He recently began consolidating his reports, which, before, were broken down by countries, so now all are in one giant PDF. As an archiver, this is something I appreciate. In any case, I wish to share with you a recent post. It’s important to open it and scroll down the near-400 pages of In Memoriam. Entries into this historical record range widely in age and nationality, but for each, their deaths were marked as either sudden or unexpected, or as with no attributed cause. A link is provided for each deceased person, which will take you to that person’s information, where you can easily verify their suspicious deaths. Often, as we well know by now, these deaths come in the form of highly “rare” illnesses, heart problems in otherwise healthy individuals, blood clots, and out-of-the-blue, often unidentifiable, medical emergencies. All of these are consistent with the side effects from Pfizer’s jab, the injection Pfizer asked a judge to prevent from being released to the public for 75 years, soon after the jabs rolled out. Thankfully, the court denied them and they have had to trickle out what the people have had every right to know, but did not, before going along with mandated or coerced toxic jabs.
The infants and children who have died through this stealth genocide are the hardest to take - such innocence and youth snuffed out before they even had a chance to fully live. However, as you scroll through the list of democide victims who died from the toxic jabs, please do not let those who are over a certain age lessen your empathy one iota, just because they are closer to a natural death due to their age. You have to look beyond the headline with such cases, and read the description about their death. MCM and his team do a remarkable job ensuring that each person in the weekly list has factors about their deaths consistent with vaccine-induced premature deaths. And the seniors in this massive compilation are still victims of state-sponsored murder and merit being recorded in this ongoing, voluminous, historical record. Additionally, who is to say whether an otherwise healthy 70-year-old would not have lived until 90, had they not been coerced into taking the dangerous jab? They were deprived their human right to live to their ultimate potential in this life.
With respect to the MCM post, I wish to note a couple of entries that stood out to me:
A pregnant 36-yr-old mother of 3 and her unborn infant die
A 6-yr-old child dies of “extreme stress and grief” after losing her (young) father
As they try to “normalize” people dying suddenly and prematurely, to normalize children having heart attacks, remember, anything they try to normalize is not normal.
Below are the weekly PDFs for the week of 2-16-25 and 2-26-25, plus a guest post also worth reading:
A great resource for a comprehensive analysis of the Pfizer documents, which were meant to be shielded from public scrutiny through all of our lifetimes, is Dr. Naomi Wolf’s exacting, monumental accumulation of analyses of the documents by a team of dedicated and experienced professionals, whose backgrounds equip them to comprehend and summarize the data. The book is called The Pfizer Papers and its Herculean content is matched by it’s physical size. Dr. Wolf’s follow-up, The Moderna Papers, can be pre-ordered on Amazon. These books have been years in the making and are jam-packed with real life data of the devastation to human life that the COVID jabs have created.
Following is the description of The Pfizer Papers on Amazon.com:
The Pfizer Papers features new reports written by WarRoom/DailyClout research volunteers, which are based on the primary source Pfizer clinical trial documents released under court order and on related medical literature. The book shows in high relief that Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial was deeply flawed and that the pharmaceutical company knew by November 2020 that its vaccine was neither safe nor effective. The reports detail vaccine-induced harms throughout the human body, including to the reproductive system; show that women suffer vaccine-related adverse events at a 3:1 ratio; expose that vaccine-induced myocarditis is not rare, mild, or transient; and, shockingly, demonstrate that the mRNA vaccines have created a new category of multi-system, multi-organ disease, which is being called “CoVax Disease.”
Despite the fact that Pfizer committed in its own clinical trial protocol to follow the placebo arm of its trial for twenty-four months, Pfizer vaccinated approximately 95 percent of placebo recipients by March 2021, thus eliminating the trial’s control group and making it impossible for comparative safety determinations to be made.
Just as importantly, The Pfizer Papers makes it clear that the US Food and Drug Administration knew about the shortfalls of Pfizer’s clinical trial as well as the harms caused by the company’s mRNA COVID vaccine product, thus highlighting the FDA’s abject failure to fulfill its mission to “[protect] the public health by ensuring the safety, efficacy, and security of human and veterinary drugs, biological products, and medical devices.”
The Pfizer Papers offers an in-depth look at how Big Pharma, the US government, and healthcare entities stand protected behind the broad legal immunity provided by the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) when creating, prescribing, and administering vaccines; and, under that shield of protection, do what is best for their bottom lines rather than for the health and well-being of Americans.
The following is an extraordinary 114-page class action lawsuit, Case 3 24 CV 00297 Yellen Et Al V Biden Et Al, that some courageous attorneys filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division, on October 15, 2024. The suit goes straight to the heart of the matter and accuses the defendants of being involved in numerous crimes of genocide. It is fascinating for many reasons, and has both flaws and strengths. I will share my thoughts on those, as a layperson, which I hope will emphasize why it is well worth reading in its entirety. Note: the first 36 pages list the defendants, so the substance of the suit starts on the bottom of p.36.
While I am not an attorney, nor do I have any legal training in my background, I have been studying numerous lawsuits and pieces of legislation pertaining to the COVID 19 bioweapon, since its release in 2020. What I can offer are simply my impressions.
First, let’s examine the more prominent flaws. This civil lawsuit, for which I provide a PDF download below, filed on behalf of seven individuals representing the class of US citizens, is so enormously comprehensive that I fear that it’s massive scope, despite its accuracy, may serve to hinder its success. There are so many defendants that it might be considered a case of overshoot. Still, I applaud it, as the enumerated defendants absolutely need to be held to account. Additionally, with regard to its comprehensiveness, the lawsuit goes after numerous and varied forms of the crimes against the American people’s lives and health, ranging from the COVID 19 bioweapon injections, to 5G, to geoengineering, to fluoride in the water, to electromagnetic fields (EMFs), and more. It touches on many aspects of the death jab, such as gene-editing capabilities, spike protein, hot lots, mRNA delivery and RNA transcription, nanoparticle technology, contamination, Pfizer’s hidden adverse event data, foreknowledge of harm, deliberate lies about efficacy and safety through mass propaganda, and censorship of grievous injuries, side effects, and deaths. It goes through a litany of toxins, poisons, food contaminants, pesticides, carcinogens, and more used in a slow stream of steady exposures, so incremental that people never even notice. Years of such exposures accumulate leading to severe disease, disability, and deaths that were tragically preventable. The suit then spells out other atrocities recently perpetrated on the American people, such as treason, border invasion, and terror attacks. It even discusses the illegal use of taxpayers’ money to fund a variety of things for foreign countries. To recap, the biggest flaw with the suit, in my estimation, is the colossal scope of crimes and defendants tied together within its pages. While not too big for my taste, I worry about its vast range of content putting off judge and jury.
Now, let’s look briefly at its less significant flaws. In general, the suit is written with noticeable sloppiness. It contains numerous typos and clerical errors, but it also, at times, confuses names and shows some obvious copy and paste maneuvers, leaving a trail of mis-matched fonts. For a legal document, I personally find that lack of accuracy in style, thought not in content, lacking a professional standard. Another small issue I take with the suit is its description of Project Veritas, which it impugns as less than legitimate journalism. I am not sure where the disconnect emerged with the disdain for PV, who uses the same journalistic tactics as 60 Minutes is well-known for and used over many decades. Still, this is a nominal concern, in relation to the enormity of details I believe the lawsuit illustrates.
That is a perfect segue to the strengths of the lawsuit, not the least of which is how it so clearly defines each point it makes, leaving no ambiguity or doubt as to why it is being asserted. Every claim made, and again there are numerous, is supported by copious footnotes, citing specific resources from which assertions are supported. The suit is heavy on documentation. The comprehensiveness that I discussed as being a potential flaw with the courts is also one of my favorite features about the suit, personally, as a reader reviewing its content. I actually LOVE reading so many elaborate details intertwined into one cohesive document. It was a vindicating and satisfying read. The bottom line is that even if this suit does not succeed, it is still highly valuable as a resource that definitively catalogs multiple ways that our own government knowingly attempts to harm, maim, and kill us. It is a source that can back up the things we have tried to get across to our friends who, understandably, cannot comprehend how the people in power deliberately do us harm. Further resources provided by footnote reinforce the suit’s claims.
To convey the depth of detail written into its pages, I will offer the following quote from the lawsuit, with the PDF download underneath:
Defendant Pfizer’s criminal experimentation on civilian adults and children
with the use of varying biotechnologies in their COVID-19 mRNA nanoparticle formulations by ‘vaccine’ LOT number (with some lots known to inflict harm, ranging from serious diseases and disabilities to death), combined with lots that are placebos (known to be harmless), was confirmed by a scientific European analysis of 52 different Defendant Pfizer mRNA nanoparticle ‘vaccine’ LOTS, administered to 4,026,575 persons who received 10,793,766 doses (an average
of 2.7 injections/person) between December of 2020 and January of 2022.24
You can track the progress of the above discussed lawsuit here.
While the US is currently reeling from the recent Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) discoveries that the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has stolen massive amounts of taxpayers’ money over decades, to fund untold illicit, immoral, and evil entities and actions, such as funding both sides of wars, funding bioweapons, such as COVID 19, funding the destabilization and overthrow of foreign countries, funding lawfare attorneys to frame populist leaders on manufactured, false pretexts, funding a global censorship industrial complex, and I could go on…USAID also has funded much of the depopulation movement for more than half a century.
From a recent post written by Dr. Robert Malone, on February 6, 2025:
USAID Funds Emerging Economy Depopulation Programs
COVID vaccines, EcoHealth Alliance, and surreptitious exploitation of a Pakistani
Hepatitis B vaccine program to hunt down Osama bin Laden are not the only
“international public health” activities pursued under the flag of the USAID. It also believed to play a big role in other strategic projects, such as population control and forced sterilization campaigns.In 1966, Congress passed the Foreign Assistance Act, including a provision earmarking USAID funds for population control programs to be implemented abroad. The legislation further directed that all U.S. economic aid to foreign nations be made contingent upon their governments’ willingness to cooperate with State Department desires for the establishment of such initiatives within their own borders.
An “Office of Population” was set up within USAID, and Dr. Reimert Thorolf
Ravenholt was appointed its first director. He would hold the post until 1979, using it to create interlocking population control organizations operating with billion-dollar budgets. As his method of operation, Ravenholt adopted the practice of distributing his funds to the International Planned Parenthood Federation, the Population Council, and numerous other privately run organizations of the population control movement, enabling them to implement mass sterilization and abortion campaigns worldwide without U.S. government regulatory interference.Ravenholt also had no compunction about buying up huge quantities of unproven, unapproved, defective, or banned contraceptive drugs and intrauterine devices (IUDs) and distributing them for use by his population control movement subcontractors on millions of unsuspecting Third World women, many of whom suffered or died in consequence.
The article goes on to describe Pfizer’s Depo-Provera injection, a harmful contraceptive drug funded by the usual depopulation agenda suspects that led to infertility, among other serious health threats: USAID, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and the Clinton Health Access Initiative.
Sourced in the above article is another informative article on depopulation, titled, “The Population Control Holocaust” written by Robert Zubrin and published by The New Atlantis in the Spring of 2012. The author states:
An Office of Population was set up within USAID, and Dr. Reimert Thorolf Ravenholt was appointed its first director in 1966. He would hold the post until 1979, using it to create a global empire of interlocking population control organizations operating with billion-dollar budgets to suppress the existence of people considered undesirable by the U.S. Department of State.
Further, Zubrin discusses:
Upon coming into office in January 1969, the new Nixon administration sought to further advance the population control agenda. Responding to lobbying by General William H. Draper, Jr., the former under secretary of the Army and a leading overpopulation fear monger, Nixon approved U.S. government support for the establishment of the U.N. Fund for Population Activities (UNFPA). With this organization as a vehicle, vast additional American funds would be poured into the global population control effort, with their source disguised so as to ease acceptance by governments whose leaders needed to maintain a populist pose in opposition to “Yankee Imperialism.” While the United States was its primary backer, the UNFPA also served as a channel for significant additional population control funds from European nations, Canada, and Japan, collectively equal to about half the American effort.
Zubrin goes into great detail carefully examining the US structure and timeline of the depopulation movement, including its origins and its ultimate impact on an international scale:
Of the billions of taxpayer dollars that the U.S. government has expended on population control abroad, a portion has been directly spent by USAID on its own field activities, but the majority has been laundered through a variety of international agencies. As a result of this indirect funding scheme, all attempts to compel the population control empire to conform its activities to accepted medical, ethical, safety, or human rights norms have proven futile. Rather, in direct defiance of laws enacted by Congress to try to correct the situation, what has been and continues to be perpetrated at public expense is an atrocity on a scale so vast and varied as to almost defy description. Nevertheless, it is worth attempting to convey to readers some sense of the evil that is being done with their money.
Below is a PDF of the full article:
Back to the subject at hand:
Now let’s jump back into the All Roads Lead to Depopulation series, returning to where we last left off in Part 8 of this series - in the midst of exploring infertility induced by inoculation, most often without informed consent.
In “Fertility Control: Eugenics, Neo-Malthusianism, and Feminism” by Susanne Klausen and Alison Bashford, found within The Oxford Handbook of the History of Eugenics, published in September of 2010, the topic of sterilization is explored within the context of the evolution of neo-Malthusian ideas and their impact on societies in different countries.
Eugenicists, who were usually members of the social elite, generally advocated methods that could be closely managed by authorities, from state policies designed to prevent or delay marriage through various forms of health certificates and legal regulation…sterilization was a technology that lent itself particularly well to control by experts. It was usually achieved through surgical methods for both women and men, although biological methods (the injection of sheep spermatozoid, for example) and X-ray methods were also used.
Note: I bolded the above fonts for emphasis.
Two downloadable PDFs are below. The first contains the above-referenced article that begins on p. 98 of this 600+page book. The second is the entire book:
Vaccination began with good intent and good outcomes, but over time, it morphed into a “silent weapon” used to sterilize and cull populations (the latter, by way of inducing deadly illnesses that emerge within a few years of vaccination). Our focus in this particular post is on vaccinations resulting in sterilization, so let’s now examine several specific vaccines that proved to induce infertility.
Tetanus Vaccine
From 2017, a paper co-authored by J.W. Oller, C.A. Shaw, L. Tomljenovic, S.K. Karanja, W. Ngare, F.M. Clement, and J.R. Pillette, discussed the use of tetanus vaccines for mass sterilization in Africa, making an interesting case study. In “HCG Found in WHO Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya Raises Concern in the Developing World” we learn that:
Published research shows that by 1976 WHO researchers had conjugated tetanus toxoid (TT) with Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) producing a “birth-control” vaccine. Conjugating TT with hCG causes pregnancy hormones to be attacked by the immune system. Expected results are abortions in females already pregnant and/or infertility in recipients not yet impregnated. Repeated inoculations prolong infertility. Currently WHO researchers are working on more potent anti-fertility vaccines using recombinant DNA. WHO publications show a long-range purpose to reduce population growth in unstable “less developed countries”. By November 1993 Catholic publications appeared saying an abortifacient vaccine was being used as a tetanus prophylactic. In November 2014, the Catholic Church asserted that such a program was underway in Kenya. Three independent Nairobi accredited biochemistry laboratories tested samples from vials of the WHO tetanus vaccine being used in March 2014 and found hCG where none should be present.
Given that hCG was found in at least half the WHO vaccine samples known by the doctors involved in administering the vaccines to have been used in Kenya, our opinion is that the Kenya “anti-tetanus” campaign was reasonably called into question by the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association as a front for population growth reduction.
Not only has the US sought population reduction within our country’s borders, it has also long had a hand in propagating depopulation efforts in foreign countries, especially those that are underdeveloped.
Swine Flu Vaccine
From a paper entitled, Swine Flu Vax Increased Vaccine-Related Miscarriages 6-11 Times, we learn that the swine flu vaccine was another Trojan horse bioweapon deployed in the guise of “for the greater good” but turned out to be another biopharmaceutical toxic jab that left many people with debilitations, illness, and deaths, as well as a loss of fertility. I would direct people back to my Early Warnings post to read and view more specific material on the Swine Flu scandal. The saving grace for that era was that the jab was pulled from market, once a clear showing of adverse effects appeared, unlike the global-genocidal COVID jabs. Also in that era, a modicum of authentic journalism remained.
From Shocking Stories From Pregnant Women Who Have Had Miscarriages After Taking The Swine Flu Vaccine, written in October of 2012, we see this statement:
U.S. health authorities have made pregnant women one of the highest priority groups for getting the H1N1 swine flu vaccine, but is it actually safe for pregnant women and their babies? Well, the truth is that miscarriage reports from pregnant women who have taken the H1N1 swine flu vaccine are starting to pour in from all over the nation. Vaccines and pregnancy simply do not mix safely. In fact, the package inserts for the swine flu vaccines actually say that the safety of these vaccines for pregnant women has not been established.
This resource contains pages of testimonials by women who miscarried soon after receiving the Swine Flu (H1N1) vaccine.
It goes on to state:
The truth is that if you do take the vaccine and then something happens, you will NOT be able to sue anyone (thanks to Congress). You will have to bear all the responsibility yourself. That doctor who kept pushing and pushing it on you will tell you that it could not have been the vaccine and that you probably would have miscarried anyway.
Do you honestly want to inject a vaccine that may contain mercury, formaldehyde, polysorbate 80 (associated with infertility), triton X100 (a strong detergent), phenoxyethanol (antifreeze) and a whole bunch of other toxic ingredients into your system when you know that your baby will absorb it too and has no defenses against most of these things?
This 55-second video is included:
From Health Impact News, an article published on September 5, 2021 states:
Back before Big Pharma had total control of the corporate media, there were a few examples of investigative reporting that exposed the corruption in U.S. vaccination programs. 2/13/25, 3:33 PM Health Impact News 1976 Swine Flu Scandal: The CDC’s History of Lying About Vaccine Dangers and Effectiveness.
This is a report done by Mike Wallace of 60 Minutes in 1979 about the rushed-to-market Swine Flu vaccine of 1976, and shows how the CDC cannot be trusted for truthful vaccine information. They lied to the American people, resulting in thousands of people suffering from neurological disorders like Guillain–Barré syndrome, who tried to sue the government for damages. More people died from the vaccine than from the Swine Flu. The vaccine was pulled from the market.
Below is the PDF, chock-full of information about not only the 1976 Swine Flu health debacle, but also information about COVID 19 vaccination deaths.
The HPV Vaccine
On the Human Papillomavirus vaccine to prevent cervical cancer:
Mary Holland, President and General Counsel for Children's Health Defense, who participated in a discussion about the 2022 documentary Infertility: Diabolical Agenda, which we discussed in the last post in this series, co-authored a book entitled, The HPV Vaccine on Trial, in 2018, with Kim Mack Rosenberg and Eileen Iorio.
Chapter 10 addresses the HPV vaccine’s effect on fertility:
The vaccine manufacturers state in their package inserts that they have not
tested the vaccines’ effect on human fertility. One would expect that a vaccine
targeting a sexually transmitted virus would at least have some studies on
fertility. This is not the case. While they did some studies on rats, they did not do
any in humans. Some women did become pregnant during the trials, however,
and Merck and GSK collected and reported findings. A closer look at these data
provides some insight into fertility signals, although the FDA did not flag them
as such.…Young women have far fewer miscarriages than older women. Miscarriage is
the spontaneous loss of a pregnancy before 20 weeks. Merck used the term
“spontaneous abortion” to describe miscarriage throughout the trials. Even
though women couldn’t be pregnant on day 1 as a clinical trial condition, some
women became pregnant during the study period. Trial investigators recorded
pregnancy outcomes, specifically miscarriages and congenital birth defects.
When Merck combined all clinical trial data, the average miscarriage rate was
similar in both the Gardasil and AAHS control groups at around 25 percent.
The FDA accepted that overall, because the groups had similar rates, there was
no cause for concern. It did not look to a background miscarriage rate in the US
or any other country for comparison.
The book demonstrates a disturbing insufficiency of attention the US clinical trials for HPV vaccines paid to fertility signals and outcomes. To summarize in simple terms, the clinical trials’ results used stats that showed a 25% increase in fertility problems and miscarriages with the vaccine, but they artificially compared that figure to the figure of a counterpart drug, which also had a 25% infertility adverse event rate, so they misleadingly stated that there was no significant difference in fertility adverse events with the HPV vaccine. The part they omitted was that the typical miscarriage rate for women under 30 in the US was only 10-15%, much less than the 25% shown with the Gardasil HPV vaccine. This was an intentionally misleading report that impacted real women and their fertility.
An eye-opening portion of the book, in chapter 13, describes the completely unnecessary and unethical pursuit of vaccinating boys, who had no risk of cervical cancer and no need for this vaccine. The claims to push this were criminally false. Many boys were subjected to the invasion of toxic drugs into their bodies for no risk of the disease and no benefit for the injection, and only downside with long-term side effects, including their own fertility impairment. From the book:
SELLING A CERVICAL CANCER VACCINE TO BOYS
Just how does one go about selling a product to prevent cervical cancer
to someone who doesn’t have a cervix? Having targeted teenage girls so
intensely and having branded Gardasil as a feminist product, it might seem
a stretch to rebrand the vaccine as “masculine” and good for boys and men.
But that is precisely what Merck has done. In 2011, Merck secured ACIP’s [Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices] recommendation to administer Gardasil to 11-to-12-year-old boys, and in 2015 it got ACIP to recommend Gardasil 9 to all boys and girls. By 2015, the uptake of the vaccine among US boys was 42 percent for a first dose, compared to 60 percent of the same-aged girls.
Initially, the marketing emphasized ending male-to-female sexual
transmission of HPV. Over time, though, Merck adopted a broader “cancer
prevention” message.
…The current pitch is that the vaccine can prevent many HPV-related
cancers—penile, anal, oral, throat, and head and neck cancers, as well as
vaginal, vulvar, and cervical cancers. There’s only one problem: there are
no clinical trials that show the vaccine is effective for throat, penile, head,
or neck cancers. The FDA has not approved it for those cancers, which
predominately affect men.…The hype about preventing anal cancer also seems misleading, with a
total of about 480 anal cancer deaths per year in the US among men. In
fact, in a Merck-funded study of 4,055 males, the authors acknowledged
that HPV vaccine “efficacy against precancerous lesions was not
observed.” In other words, the vaccine did not do a better job than the trial
control in preventing anal lesions, let alone anal cancer. As Jeanne Lenzer, a
medical investigative journalist, pointedly asked, “[I]s it worth the risk of
exposing millions of youth to the as yet uncertain harms of the vaccine?”
Dr. Angela Raffle told the New York Times, “If we give it to boys, then all
pretense of scientific worth and cost analysis goes out the window.”
In summer 2016, Merck launched a new television ad campaign aimed
at both male and female preteens and their parents. The ad opens with an
actor playing a young woman who has cervical cancer. She earnestly asks
her parents if they knew that they could have prevented her cancer if they
had vaccinated her when she was 11 or 12. Then the ad cuts to a young man
who says he has an HPV-related cancer. Had his parents known about the
vaccine, they could have protected him when he was 11 or 12. The actors
ask: “Did you know? Mom, Dad?” The ad ends with the message to
parents: “What will you say? Don’t wait. Talk to your child’s doctor today.
Learn more at HPV.com.”
Playing on parents’ guilt and children’s fears, the ad reinforces the
meme that “good parents vaccinate” with Gardasil 9. Yet the ad gives
virtually no information about the virus, cancer, vaccine, doses required,
possible adverse effects, or how continued cancer screening remains
essential. The ad, directing itself squarely to children and parents, would be
illegal almost everywhere else, but it remains on the air in the US.
HPV vaccines already generate over $2.5 billion annually, with the
prospect of new markets to come: low- and middle-resource countries, boys
and men, older teens, adults, and potential booster shots. With speculation
about giving the vaccines even to babies, no demographic seems off the
table. Without question, HPV vaccines have been money-making
blockbusters.
In chapter 15, The HPV Vaccine on Trial 2018 book goes into depth recounting personal stories from young girls and young women who suffered severe adverse events from the Gardasil injection. This portrayal of their agonies really hits home. The book also delves into the duplicitous practices unleashed by Big Pharma in promotion of this vaccine. I am sure it will be no surprise to anyone reading this that extensively propagandized ad campaigns were used to target young girls and later young boys. Mind you, pap smears, a routine part of gynocological exams, were very efficient at catching cervical cancers early on, well before this drug was foisted onto the unsuspecting public.
The book also touches on common themes to what we experienced with the COVID 19 jabs, such as: “disease branding” (huge marketing campaigns to sell the public on the need for the vaccines); patent wars; the race for vaccination; the denial of informed consent; fast-tracking approval processes; negative efficacy; vaccine contaminants; underreported adverse events and deaths; and more. The book closes with describing pushback from different countries and how they fought back to enact change.
The PDF of the book is below:
Judicial Watch (JW) Founder, Tom Fitton, via FOIA request, sued Merck in 2007 to get the records of the clinical trials data and adverse events listed by Merck for the HPV vaccine. After much stonewalling, JW finally obtained documents and later published the following special report, Examining the FDA’s HPV Vaccine Records, Detailing the Approval Process, Side-Effects, Safety Concerns and Marketing Practices of a Large-Scale Public Health Experiment on June 30, 2008.
From the special report:
In May 2007, Judicial Watch submitted a request to the FDA under the Freedom
of Information Act for all records concerning Merck’s new anti-HPV vaccine, Gardasil. After Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit in October 2007 to compel record production, the FDA finally released four sets of documents, the last in June 2008. These records detail the development and expedited approval of Gardasil. The documents include patent and licensing memoranda, test reports for the vaccine, and the final briefing document on Gardasil submitted to the FDA in April 2006, one month before the vaccine was approved. The FDA also produced 8,864 VAERS reports. Judicial Watch uncovered a transcript of Merck’s May 18, 2006, meeting with the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC), at which the vaccine received a unanimous vote of approval.
Analysis of the records shows:
• Gardasil is a prophylactic, preventative vaccine and will not treat pre-existing
HPV infection. It is not a cancer vaccine or cure.• Gardasil is marketed as a vaccine that prevents cancer, but it “ . . . has not
been evaluated for the potential to cause carcinogenicity or genotoxicity.”• Gardasil is not 100% effective against all HPVs. It is designed to protect
against only four strains of HPV, even though there are over thirty strains
including at least fifteen that can cause cancer.• While Gardasil is the most expensive vaccine ever to be recommended by the
FDA, its long-term effectiveness is unknown and could be as brief as only two
to three years.• During testing, an aluminum-containing placebo was used. Aluminum can
cause permanent cell damage and is a reactive placebo, unlike most standard
saline placebos. This means that tests of Gardasil may not have given an
accurate picture of safety levels.• Although some states are considering making it mandatory for young girls to
get the Gardasil vaccine, it has only been tested with one other vaccine
commonly given to children. There are ten commonly administered
adolescent vaccines.• Gardasil is still in the testing stages, and will not be fully evaluated for safety
until September 2009. VAERS reports show that as many as eighteen people
have died after receiving Gardasil.
Below is an excerpt taken from another case of spontaneous abortion, occurring less than two weeks after the patient received her second dose of Gardasil:
The patient was vaccinated with second dose of HPV and
had a positive pregnancy test the next day. The patient
presented to the physician’s office on 09-APR-2007 with
vaginal bleeding and a pelvic ultrasound determined that
she was suffering a spontaneous abortion . . . The patient
was admitted to the hospital . . . with severe vaginal
hemorrhaging and underwent an emergency dilation and
curettage procedure . . . The physician considered
spontaneous abortion to be significantly disabling and life
threatening.
The PDF is below. Within the report, greater details are provided.
SIDE NOTE: Did you catch that back in 2008, there were only “ten commonly administered adolescent vaccines”? The number of commonly administered adolescent vaccines in 2025 has skyrocketed since that time, along with a plague of chronic illnesses and infertility not widely seen in populations before numerous vaccines were added to the “vaccine schedule” for children and adolescents. I asked Grok (my first time to use it) how many vaccines were on the vaccine schedule for infants and teens. Here’s is Grok’s answer:
In the United States, the current recommended schedule from the CDC, as advised by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), includes vaccines to protect against 15 different diseases for children and teens from birth through age 18. However, the total number of doses is higher because many vaccines require multiple shots to build full immunity.
Here’s the breakdown:
There are 15 distinct vaccines targeting diseases like measles, mumps, rubella, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (whooping cough), polio, hepatitis B, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), pneumococcal disease, varicella (chickenpox), hepatitis A, human papillomavirus (HPV), meningococcal disease, and influenza.
Some vaccines, like MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) or DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis), combine protection against multiple diseases in one shot.
Many require multiple doses—e.g., DTaP has 5 doses, HPV has 2-3 depending on age, and the flu vaccine is annual starting at 6 months.
Counting all recommended doses (including boosters and annual flu shots through age 18), the total can reach around 50-70 injections or administrations, depending on factors like whether combination vaccines are used or if optional vaccines (like meningococcal B) are included.
Permit me a slight digression on the topic of vaccines: let’s turn now to a report from Sharyl Attkisson, from 2006, on the negative efficacy and deadliness of flu shots in the elderly population, for whom flu shots are resolutely recommended. Other than Sharyl’s last spoken line of her report, which, knowing what I know now in 2025, made me cringe, it is a fair report, again, made back when a shred of journalism still existed among mainstream media sources.
After investigating the lies and carnage left in the wake of the COVID 19 “vaccines,” I imagine that today, Sharyl, herself, would also cringe with the last line of her report. She has been a fearless reporter during these dark times of propaganda, censorship, and psy-ops.
That will wrap up this post. Thank you for your time and care in reading it. I know it is a lot of material to work through!
The more who see this material, the better off we will all be, so please feel free to share:
Also, if you have not yet done so, you may subscribe free-of-charge, anytime:
I look forward to the publishing the next installment in this series and hope you will stay tuned for more.
Thank you for your readership!
All my best,
Bianca
GREAT work, Bianca!
Phenomenal work, Bianca!
It has taken us years to muster the courage to face clear and comprehensive reports such as yours. You’ve woven so many pieces together in this single post.
Mandating, marketing, and coercing humans, plants, and animals to inhale, ingest, and inject so many devastating “safe and effective” toxins from vaccines, to EMR, geoengineering, water additives (e.g. fluoride), and agricultural products (e.g., glyphosate) isn’t simply commerce. It’s evil and it’s power. Five years ago, we were blissfully unaware of it all. But now, thanks to you and so many others, we see the depopulation agenda’s inky darkness.
Thank you for your dedication and exhaustive efforts to bring this information into the light.